6 Effective Ways to Manage Conflict at Work

6 Effective Ways to Manage Conflict at Work

Conflict at work can be difficult to deal with, but it’s something that every manager needs to be aware of and prepared for. If you’re not expecting it and aren’t ready to manage it, it can quickly become a source of tension and chaos. This blog discusses the top 6 ways to manage conflict at work for managers and leaders. We have also discussed various types of workplace conflicts and why managers should give conflict management a top priority. By taking these steps, you’ll better equip yourself to manage conflict at work, and everyone will be happier! So, let’s start with understanding what exactly a conflict is.

What is a Conflict?

Conflict is a disagreement or hostility among individuals or groups about something. It can be physical, verbal, emotional, social, and even workplace. It is defined as a disagreement or argument between people or groups of people, typically a heated one. Anything from a dispute about a project at work to a disagreement about resource allocation can spark a conflict. Conflict can be healthy or harmful, constructive or destructive, depending on how we handle it. In general, though, we see conflict as unfavorable because it can lead to division, anger, and even violence. It’s often best to resolve workplace conflicts as quickly and peacefully as possible. Conflict is an inevitable and often necessary part of the workplace. It is basically when two or more people are working together to accomplish a common goal, and they encounter difficulties with each other. It adds stress for both managers and employees as it can be tiring and overwhelming to have conflict constantly in the workplace.
A conflict at work can also become extremely dangerous if left unchecked. There can be various causes of conflict in the workplace, including different goals, personalities, opinions, beliefs, standards, work styles, etc. However, someone will have had enough no matter how long you treat these interpersonal differences (distances) with caution.

Who is responsible for managing and resolving these conflicts?

It is not difficult to answer this question. Managers are the obvious ones responsible for conflict management and conflict resolution. Conflict management skills are a significant part of the skills required for managers to be effective in their roles. They are responsible for both setting up the work environment and team dynamics. Managers are in charge of making sure everyone gets along within the organization. They do it by always doing their due diligence to pay attention to any potential conflicts. Additionally, administrators such as HR managers or senior management have a significant role in controlling the process of managing conflicts at organizational levels and how it affects individual employees (e.g., employee turnover). Managers are not just responsible for managing conflicts, but they also need to give managing these conflicts top priority. Let’s now discuss the reasons behind it.

Why should managers try to manage conflict at work?

There are many reasons why managers should give top priority to managing conflict at work. Some of the biggest and the most common ones are as follows:
  • Conflict can lead to less efficient work and lower productivity
  • It can cause morale problems, sow distrust and discord within teams, and impair team performance
  • Workplace conflicts can even lead to lawsuits or other legal disputes
  • It can negatively impact the organization’s image and brand
  • It can increase staff turnover rates
  • Managing conflict effectively is essential for fostering organizational trust and communication
  • Effective resolution of conflict at work leads to cooperation, improved teamwork, more productive employees, and ultimately firmer relationships
Given the above, it is evident that managers need to manage conflict at work effectively for short- and long-term success.

What do typical workplace conflicts look like? 3 Workplace conflict scenarios for managers

Scenario 1: Mediation 

Two employees in a marketing department are having a conflict about the use of resources. One believes that the other is using too many resources for their project, while the other believes they are justified in their usage. The manager decides to mediate the conflict by meeting with both employees. During the meeting, the manager encourages both parties to listen to each other’s perspectives and to find common ground. The manager facilitates the discussion and helps them devise a compromise where the employee using the resources agrees to share them with the other employee and work together more closely in the future. The manager also sets up a follow-up meeting to ensure the agreement is upheld. Read more: How Negotiation And Conflict Resolution Go Hand-In-Hand? With 5 Examples

Scenario 2: Collaboration 

A sales team is having a conflict over a new client, with two employees competing for the same account. The manager resolves the conflict by encouraging the employees to work together on the account. The manager suggests they pool their strengths and skills to give the client the best possible service. The manager facilitates a brainstorming session where both employees contribute their ideas and develop a plan of action. They agree to divide the work and keep each other updated on progress. The manager also sets up a system for regular check-ins to ensure successful collaboration.

Scenario 3: Coaching 

Two employees in a production department are having a conflict over the quality of work. One employee believes that the other is not producing work that meets the required standards, while the other believes that their work is satisfactory. The manager decides to resolve the conflict by coaching both employees. The manager sets up individual meetings with each employee to discuss their perspectives and provides feedback on their work. The manager also offers guidance, suggestions for improvement, and plans for ongoing training and support. The manager follows up with both employees regularly to monitor their progress and ensure the conflict has been resolved. Read more: Coaching Employee with Negative Attitude to turn them around in 5 easy steps

How to resolve conflict in the workplace as a manager? 6 Effective Ways

Create an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect

The first step for managers to effectively manage workplace conflicts is to create an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect. Managers should create a work environment where employees feel comfortable sharing disagreements, different viewpoints, resentment, or problems. They can do this by creating a climate of openness and communication. They should also be fostering trust between managers and subordinates. When employees feel that managers respect their concerns and they can talk to their manager openly about any conflict, managing the conflict will get easier. Lack of trust and mutual respect leads to conflicts becoming entrenched, making it more challenging to resolve them.

Listen attentively and offer constructive feedback

Active listening to employee concerns is the best way for managers to understand better the problems and emotions that have led to the conflict. Managers should ask questions to understand what led to the conflict from each person’s point of view. This type of effective communication is essential in resolving disputes. Because it allows both parties involved in a dispute to voice their opinions without feeling judged or defensive. Additionally, by offering constructive feedback after listening to the concerns, managers can help employees understand the real reason behind the conflict they are finding themselves in. It can help employees easily overcome conflict at work. It will also help them learn, which may help them avoid these conflicts in the future. That will ultimately make it easy to manage conflicts. Read more: Practicing Empathetic Communication: 5 Secrets of Successful Managers

Address the root cause of the conflict promptly

Once they identify a conflict at work, managers need to address its underlying cause as soon as possible. You can do this by discussing the problem openly and candidly and addressing the point of view of both parties involved. Managers can then create a common ground and work together to develop a solution that satisfies all parties quickly. If they do not resolve the conflict soon, it may become entrenched and more difficult to determine. Getting to know the root cause can allow managers to come up with new ways or interventions to avoid the same in the future. What are the common workplace conflicts? Identify the types here.

Avoid getting drawn into an argument or a heated debate with your colleagues

Managers should make sure to keep the arguments internal to the workplace. They should, very importantly, avoid getting drawn into a heated debate with their colleagues. Getting drawn into a heated discussion will be ineffective in resolving the conflict, but it may also lead to further resentment. These heated debates can also be counterproductive to delivering objectives and goals set by the organization. To avoid this and manage workplace conflicts effectively, managers should respond to employee concerns but not take a negative response personally. When disagreements do arise, managers should control their emotions and should try to address them calmly and rationally using constructive criticism. If the conflicting parties do not agree with the best solution you could provide, you should not lose your cool. It would be best to work together with them to develop a different solution or course of action that can prove acceptable to the conflicting parties.

Avoid personal attacks or demeaning comments directed at others

Many people view workplace conflicts as an opportunity to attack the other person and try to win. However, this type of behavior is counterproductive and will only lead to further conflict. Managers should avoid personal attacks or demeaning comments directed at others to manage conflicts effectively. When tensions are running high, it can be challenging to stay calm and constructive. However, resorting to personal attacks will only make the situation worse. Demeaning comments damage relationships and can also be damaging to a company’s reputation. Managers should try to stay focused on the issue at hand. They should remember that the goal is to manage and resolve the conflict and not to initiate another one. Therefore, they should avoid personal attacks or demeaning comments as doing so will help maintain a positive working environment. It will also help to resolve the conflict more effectively. Instead of passing these attacks or comments, managers should empathize with the conflicting parties. Doing that will make all parties feel safe and secure. It leads to greater insight and a more effective resolution of the issue at hand.

Offer support and praise when a conflict is resolved

When a conflict is resolved, it’s essential to offer your employees sincere congratulations and show them support in their recovery. You can do it by praising them for their efforts, providing assistance if needed, or sending a thank you note. Providing recovery support to employees after resolving the conflicts can show how much the organization takes their personal growth and development into importance. It will also provide employees with a sense of security. Further, managers can build trust with their team members by communicating appreciation and encouragement. All that together can also help avoid further conflicts among colleagues after conflict resolution has been achieved.

Conclusion

In today’s competitive and fast-paced world, workplace conflicts are inevitable. But not all conflicts are created equal. Some are miscommunications or misunderstandings, while others can escalate into full-blown disputes that can hurt team productivity and morale. As a manager, it’s your responsibility to know the different types of workplace conflicts and resolve conflict at work effectively. You should know that you are the one responsible for managing them. Further, you should also know how to resolve them to benefit everyone involved. We’ve outlined the 6 top easy-to-follow ways to manage conflict at work in this blog. So whether you’re a new manager just starting or an experienced one looking for new and innovative ways to manage conflicts successfully, we believe these ways will help you out.

Test your conflict management skills for free!

Take the free conflict management assessment now to assess areas that need improvement.


Managing Conflict at Work FAQs

What are the most common conflicts at work?

Common conflicts at work arise due to task-based differences or personality differences. Different opinions and working styles can also cause conflicts. These differences can grow into more significant conflicts when they are not dealt with maturely.

How to manage conflict between employees?

The key to managing conflict effectively as a manager is understanding the issue from multiple perspectives. It starts with being open to differing opinions, letting go of biases, and maintaining an objective approach when making decisions. Also, encourage employees to work out issues amicably.

How can conflict in the workplace affect the team?

Frequent conflicts create a hostile work environment which harms employees’ psychological safety. Typically, conflicts bring down productivity and reduce team cohesion. It contributes to lousy performance and can lead to high absenteeism and turnover among employees.

Other Related Blogs

5 Secrets To Conflict Resolution At Work For Managers

5 Secrets To Conflict Resolution At Work For Managers Conflict is all too common. We often encounter this ever-present demon in our workplaces, too. The trouble is manifold for managers…

Top 5 ways for Leadership Training Emotional Intelligence

Top 5 ways for Leadership Training Emotional Intelligence The most effective leaders are not just intelligent but are emotionally intelligent. Emotional Intelligence (EI) training can enhance leadership skills because it…

Be a Star Sales Manager: Top 6 Skills needed and ways to enhance them

Be a Star Sales Manager: Top 6 Skills needed and ways to enhance them Behind every successful sales team, there is an exceptional sales manager. A sales manager is critical…

Top 15 Tips for Effective Conflict Mediation at Work

Top 15 Tips for Effective Conflict Mediation at Work As a manager or leader, you might be familiar with the conflicts that arise in the workplace. It’s not always easy…

Persuasive and Argumentative communication: The right approach for workplace success

Persuasive and Argumentative communication: The right approach for workplace success

Communication is a vital skill in the workplace, and it comes in different forms. Two common approaches to communication are persuasive and argumentative communication. While they may seem similar on the surface, they have distinct differences in their approaches and outcomes. In this blog, we will explore the nuances of persuasive and argumentative communication and how they impact workplace interactions. Whether you’re a manager looking to improve your communication skills or an employee navigating professional relationships, understanding the difference between persuasive and argumentative communication can help you communicate more effectively, build stronger relationships, and achieve your desired outcomes. We will explore the key characteristics of persuasive and argumentative communication, discuss their advantages and limitations in the workplace, and provide practical ways to utilize each approach in different scenarios effectively. By the end of this blog, you will clearly understand how persuasive and argumentative communication differ and how to apply them strategically in your workplace communication for optimal results.

Persuasive and Argumentative Communication

Effective communication is crucial for managers in the workplace. It allows them to convey their message clearly to their team, which is essential for the success of any team. However, managers can use two types of communication to achieve their goals: persuasive and argumentative. Persuasive communication is a type of communication that aims to convince the team members to take a particular action or adopt a specific point of view. This approach is often used when managers want to motivate their employees to achieve a particular goal or to persuade them to support a particular project or idea. Persuasive communication is usually centered around emotional appeals, storytelling, and rhetorical devices such as analogies, metaphors, and similes. Argumentative communication is used when managers want to prove a point or win a debate. It relies on facts, data, and logic to persuade the audience to accept a particular conclusion or to support a specific decision. Argumentative communication requires a more analytical approach and usually involves using evidence, statistics, and expert opinions to support the manager’s position.

Advantages of persuasive communication 

There are several advantages of using persuasive communication in the workplace. These include:
  • Motivating employees: Persuasive communication can be a powerful tool for motivating employees to take action and work towards a common goal. By presenting a compelling vision and inspiring employees to take ownership of their work, managers can create a sense of purpose and drive that can increase productivity and job satisfaction.
  • Building rapport: Persuasive communication often involves emotional appeals and storytelling, which can help to build rapport and create a sense of connection between managers and employees. Managers can foster trust and create a more positive work environment by establishing a personal connection with their team.
  • Encouraging innovation: Persuasive communication can effectively encourage employees to think creatively and develop innovative solutions to problems. Managers can tap into their team’s creative potential and generate new ideas and approaches by presenting a challenge or Goal and encouraging employees to think outside the box.
  • Improving teamwork: Persuasive communication helps align team members around a common goal or vision, enhancing collaboration and teamwork. Managers can build a more cohesive and productive team by inspiring employees to work together towards a shared purpose.
  • Gaining support: Persuasive communication can be an effective way to gain buy-in for new initiatives or changes in the workplace. By presenting a compelling case for why a particular decision or change is necessary, managers can win their team’s support and help ensure that changes are implemented smoothly and successfully.

Limitations of argumentative communication

Some of the limitations of argumentative communication include:
  • Time-consuming: Argumentative communication often involves presenting evidence, considering opposing viewpoints, and engaging in back-and-forth discussions. As a result, it can be time-consuming and may slow down decision-making processes, especially in fast-paced work environments.
  • Emotionally charged: Arguments can sometimes become emotionally charged, especially when people have strong personal beliefs or are invested in a particular outcome. This can make it difficult to remain objective and sometimes result in hurt feelings or damaged relationships.
  • Inflexible: Argumentative communication often involves presenting and defending a particular viewpoint with evidence and reasoning. While this can be effective in some cases, it can also be inflexible and may not allow for alternative perspectives or creative solutions.
  • May not be effective with certain personalities: Some people may not respond well to argumentative communication, particularly those who are more emotional or prefer a more collaborative approach to decision-making.
  • May not be suitable for all situations: While argumentative communication can be effective in some cases, it may not be suitable for all. For example, a more collaborative approach may be more appropriate when dealing with complex or sensitive issues.

Traits of persuasive communications

  • Empathy: Persuasive communicators seek to understand the other person’s perspective and emotions and strive to connect with them on a deeper level.
  • Credibility: Persuasive communicators establish credibility by presenting a strong and compelling case supported by evidence, expertise, or experience.
  • Flexibility: Persuasive communicators are adaptable and open to new ideas and perspectives and are willing to adjust their approach to meet the needs and preferences of the other person.
  • Active listening: Persuasive communicators actively listen to the other person, asking questions and clarifying their understanding to ensure they address their concerns and needs.
  • Focus on common ground: Persuasive communicators seek to find common ground with the other person and build on areas of agreement rather than focusing solely on areas of disagreement.
  • Respectful: Persuasive communicators respect the other person’s opinions and feelings and avoid attacking or belittling them.
Persuasive communication is about building trust, creating a sense of mutual understanding, and finding common ground.

Traits of argumentative communications

  • Assertiveness: Argumentative communication often involves a high degree of assertiveness, with the communicator expressing their point of view strongly and confidently.
  • Aggressiveness: At times, argumentative communication can turn aggressive if the communicator becomes overly emotional or dismissive of the other person’s perspective.
  • Focus on winning: In argumentative communication, the communicator often focuses on winning the argument rather than finding common ground or understanding the other person’s perspective.
  • Use of logic and evidence: Argumentative communication relies heavily on logic and evidence to support the communicator’s position, often using examples, data, and research to support their claims.
  • Adversarial approach: Argumentative communication can take a negative approach, with the communicator taking an “us versus them” mentality, seeing the other person as an opponent rather than a collaborator.
  • Defensive: Communicators who rely on argumentative communication may be defensive about their position, refusing to consider alternative perspectives or criticism.
While argumentative communication can be effective in certain situations, it can also limit potential outcomes. 

Examples of persuasive communication

  • Convincing employees to adopt new policies or procedures to improve efficiency or productivity.
  • Encouraging employees to take on new projects or initiatives that require extra effort or time.
  • Motivating employees to achieve a particular goal or milestone, such as increasing sales or improving customer satisfaction.
  • Persuading employees to support a particular decision or course of action, such as a change in organizational structure or a new product launch. 

Examples of argumentative communication

  • Presenting a case for a particular budgetary decision backed up by data and evidence.
  • Persuading employees to accept a change in policy by presenting a compelling argument for why the change is necessary and beneficial.
  • Resolving a conflict between team members by presenting a logical and objective argument that considers the interests of all parties involved.
  • Making a case for a particular strategy or approach based on evidence from previous successful initiatives or industry research.

How can managers become more persuasive rather than argumentative while communicating?

  • Listen actively: Effective communication involves not only speaking persuasively but also listening actively. Managers should take the time to listen to their employees’ concerns and opinions and show that they value their input.
  • Focus on common ground: Instead of getting caught up in areas of disagreement, managers should seek to find common ground and build on areas of agreement. This can help create a sense of mutual understanding and trust.
  • Use empathy: Managers can connect with their employees on a deeper level and understand their perspectives and emotions. Managers can build stronger relationships and create a more positive workplace culture by showing that they care about their employees’ well-being and concerns.
  • Be credible: Persuasive communicators establish credibility by presenting a strong and compelling case supported by evidence, expertise, or experience. Managers should take the time to research and prepare their arguments and present them clearly and convincingly.
  • Avoid defensiveness: Managers should remain open and receptive to alternative perspectives instead of becoming defensive or dismissive when faced with criticism or disagreement. This can help create a more collaborative and inclusive workplace culture.
  • Be respectful: Persuasive communicators respect the other person’s opinions and feelings and avoid attacking or belittling them. Managers should treat their employees respectfully and show they value their contributions.
By adopting a more persuasive approach to communication, managers can build stronger relationships with their employees, foster a more positive workplace culture, and achieve their objectives respectfully, collaboratively, and effectively.

Conclusion 

In conclusion, persuasive and argumentative communication are two distinct approaches to workplace communication, each with its own goals, approaches, and outcomes. While persuasive communication focuses on building trust, finding common ground, and appealing to emotions and values, argumentative communication aims to win a debate or argument through logical reasoning and evidence. Both persuasive and argumentative communication have their advantages and limitations in the workplace. Understanding the appropriate use of persuasive and argumentative communication in different workplace scenarios is essential. Managers and employees can benefit from honing their communication skills and choosing the right approach based on the context and desired outcome. In conclusion, mastering persuasive and argumentative communication can empower professionals to navigate workplace interactions with finesse, achieve communication objectives, and foster positive relationships with colleagues. 

Test your communication skills to understand which side you lean on

Take the free communication skills assessment now to understand your strong areas.


Frequently asked questions

What makes an argument persuasive?

A persuasive argument is compelling and influential, aiming to convince others to adopt a particular viewpoint or take a specific action. Several key elements contribute to the persuasiveness of an argument:
– Evidence and reasoning
– Emotional appeal
– Credibility and trustworthiness

What is the difference between persuasive and informative communication?

Persuasive communication aims to change or reinforce the audience’s attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors, while informative communication seeks to convey information or knowledge about a topic or issue. The key differences between persuasive and informative communication are Goal, approach, audience response, and bias.

What is the difference between arguing to convince and persuade?

Arguing to convince and persuade are two related but distinct approaches to communication. The key differences between the two are focus, outcome, approach, and relationship.

Other Related Blogs

Grooming for Management: The Key to Building a Sustainable Leadership Pipeline

Grooming for Management: The Key to Building a Sustainable Leadership Pipeline Imagine a crucial leadership position opening up in your organization. You scramble to fill the role, internally and externally,…

Leader Competence: The Cornerstone of Effective Leadership Development

Leader Competence: The Cornerstone of Effective Leadership Development Imagine you’re leading a talented team, but somehow, projects are stalling, and motivation seems slipping. You see the potential in your people,…

Confused by L&D Metrics? Here’s How to Focus on What Matters

Confused by L&D Metrics? Here’s How to Focus on What Matters You’ve undoubtedly witnessed companies celebrating a record number of employees completing leadership training programs. Champagne toasts erupt, press releases…

Is Executive Coaching Cost Worth the Investment? Exploring Options for Leaders

Is Executive Coaching Cost Worth the Investment? Exploring Options for Leaders In today’s dynamic business landscape, effective leadership is no longer a privilege; it’s a necessity. This has fueled the…
Exit mobile version